Showing posts with label bitraf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bitraf. Show all posts

3D milling aluminium and stainless steel

This weekend i held courses in Fusion 360 at Bitraf. We started of with a course aimed for people without any 3D modelling experience on friday, then went trough some of the more advanced functions on saturday, before moving on to the CAM function and 3D printing on sunday.

On saturday i lectured about assembly in fusion, and the difference between bodies and components, and how to structure the file when building an assembly with moving parts. The case for this weekend was this machinist vise, as we then could use the model when we were milling on sunday.



After modelling the vise, we modelled a test case, 60x60x100 with some random topografy for testing out Fusion CAM's adaptive clearing. As we now had a 3D model of the vise, we could now easly activate collision detection, aswell as grabbing the necesary geometry for mounting the vise to our machine.


As this weekends goal was to experiment with 3D milling, we also tried some different finishing strategies. For aluminium, what worked best where a 6mm singleflute ballmill. Above is a rendered image of the vice, with the finishing toolpath projected on to it using gimp.


The machining process leaves a mess, but since i where using adaptive clearing, it's a uniform mess. All the chips are uniform, since the tool cut the material with a constant load.
I did several tests with different stepdown and stepover. For each test, i let one side be finished, while the other side still had the surface from the roughing pass.


I also machined a 50x50x50 block of stainless steel, this was the result:



This is the toolpath for the steel block. The model was produced by warping a hexagon along an the center axis. As the material was stainless steel, the stepdown was kept low at 0.2mm, but the feedrate high at 1600 mm/min.



The three samples sitting at my desk after a long weekend. i have now aquired the knowledge needed for producing my first injection mold.


Assembling giant vacuum wall




Months ago i agreed on designing and manufacture a 2100x2500 vacuum wall for Norwegian artist pushwagner´s photo studio.
After producing the technical drawings, the contract was signed, and the product taken into production at Fellesverkstedet

Below are som photos from the production of the vacuum wall.




The vacuumwall must be adjustable. Therefore, mechanical valves where added in form of PE slides.
As a consequence of this, the vall became very thick, and several hundred screws had to be used to keep it from imploding from the underpressure.

This is one of the two halves making up the vacuum wall under assembly.



Here, the two halves of the vacuum table stands ready for delivery and mounting at the customers photo studio:



Autodesk Fusion 360

Yesterday, i and Christian Anker from bitraf spent all day produsing parts using Autodesk Fusion 360's CAM module. We produced the toolpaths on my macbook air, then seamlesly beamed them over to the CNC machine using Dropbox.

The more we learn about production technology, the more we can reduce the turnaround time from concept to reality. For the case of the two copper pieces below, that time ended up at 43 minutes.



Before the copper parts where made, prototypes where made in aluminium. The 3D milling where done at 25mm/sek, with a 1/8 inch ballnose mill.

This assembly is the hammer parts of Koka nicoladze´s new instrument; the solenoid drummer.

As we did further adventures into CNC milling with the shopbot, Christian anker decided he wanted to produce the build platform for his huge part for his 3D printer.
As it must be perfectly flat, it had to be facemilled. We decided to do this with this 32 mm milling bit.


This is the finished part rigth after milling:


Since teaching Christian to mill aluminium with the shopbot CNC machine, he has produced a number of parts for his 3D printer:



What is stepover?



Stepover is the distance from the tool center between two passes. Increasing the stepover will result in shorter machining time, but also a rougher surface finish.

When milling with a flat end mill, or a facemill, the main parameters you can controll is machinetime and chipload, as the surface produced will be flat anyway. However, with a ballnose bit, it`s a different story. As the milling bit has a radius at it's end, It will leave a raised bit of material in between the passes.

This leftover material is called scallop.

The scallop heigth and width increases when stepover is increased, and decreased when the stepover is reduced. The scallop is marked in red in the following picture:




Using a previously generated toolpath, we can further investigate the stepover, and the effect it impacts on the surface. 

Shown below, is three identical shapes, where the toolpaths generated has different stepovers, ranging from 0,5mm from left, to 2,5mm in the middle, and 5mm stepover to the rigth

The choosen tool in this case where a 10mm ballnose, and the machining times where as following: 

0:09:17
0:02:09
0:01:16



When you have simulated a toolpath in Fusion 360, you can download the resulting geometry as an STL file. 
I downloaded all the resulting files, then rendered them lined up, to display the resulting surfaces.


The results appears to conjoin with the theory, a finer stepover results in a finer surface quality, at the expence of machining time.

The stepover parameter can be reached by selecting the 'passes' tab when producing 3D toolpaths.


Rigid FDM delta printer

Altough we have a few FDM printers at Bitraf, i now see the need for having my own at my office. i started to develop a small scale delta printer last week.

The printer is constructed from a plates milled from sheet of 10mm 6082 t651 aluminium.

Movement is performed by NEMA17 steppermotors, and HIWIN linear bearing rails.

This is what i have modeled so far:



As the ultimakers, this design also equips the captured nut concept, in this case M6 nuts, as seen in this cutaway:






In this cutaway, the belt tenison system can been seen in the lower left corner. Notice the stiffening bracket in the middle of the linear rail assembly, and the milled weigth reducing pockets.



These are the main components of the printer, here laid out, ready for toolpath generation.


I decided to use this project as a testcase for Fusion 360`CAM strategies, in this case adaptive clearing.

The milling bits normaly break When peak loads is achived when running into a corner. Therefore, the feedrate must be reduced for the entirety of the toolpath when using normal CAM strategies for avoiding milling bit failure:



What adaptive clearing does, is to slowly dig the milling bit into the material, before performing a series of deep cuts at maximum depth, with optimal chipload. In this way, the tool will not experience peeks in loads, as the tool will have constand load. This reduces the runtime with a suposed 40%

I will spend the next weeks experimenting further with Fusion CAM. This is my first result with adaptive clearing:




Pulsejet sled update

Finaly got the time to do some welding on the Pulsejet powered sled. i added the reinforcement bars at the back, and prepared the aluminium bracket for welding. The jet sled is currently being exhibited at NDC oslo 2016 together with my hexapod.




Recycling PLA from 3D prints


Jens Dyvik and Jon Nordby did some research and experimenting on recycling 3D print waste, aswell as combining plastic and wood waste.


Upper plate: Grinded PLA.
Left plate: PLA and valchromat combined.
Rigth box: the burnt and failed results of valchromat combined with PLA.


The plastic was grinded using a household mixmaster.


This block is pure PLA casted in a box, then put under pressure by the means of vices.

This however, is the result of a failed batch of PLA and valchromat: 



Evacuating the oven from TorbjørnNordvik on Vimeo.

The CNC machine produces a smaller CNC

I produced the parts for a friends smaller CNC, on Bitraf's huge CNC. How cool is that?



The cutting has begun!




The baby CNC! The banana is for scale. NOTE: This is an imperial banana, not a metric one!




Here, the brackets is installed. 


This is the machine with the bridge installed, waiting for the spindle.



The tools used for the roughing and finnishing. The bigger 8mm bit has two flutes, and provides exelent chip removal rates, while the smaller singleflute 6mm leaves a great finish, at the cost of efficience.

For more info on the CNC, follow this link.

Antenna for drone

Made the mounting ring for this antenna for a client today, as we milled it from a soft alloy of aluminium, we churned this out at 12mm/sek 4mm cut depth with a 6mm bit.


Making A wax seal

Christina lewis came up with the idea of making her logo into a wax seal. Challenge accepted! So today, i milled the logo itself from a block of aluminium, going slow at 6mm/sek with a 2mm singleflute bit @ 18000 RPM, the handle will be made later from some wood.

we started out with a simplified vector file, wich we then made toolpaths from in Vcarve, the program which writes code to the CNC machine.



The machining process is loud, and draws attention!


The finnished seal:


The end result:






largest aluminium part so far!

I manufactured my biggest part so far on the shopbot, a camera mount for taking FPV shots of the milling process. the part where designed in Autodesk fusion 360. 

                           Here i am mounting the freshly made camera mount on our shopbot.


Using the slots in the mount, the camera can be positioned in several angels ensuring the best shot.


This bracket were cut using a singleflute carbide 6mm bit @18000 RPM, 10mm/sek and 2,8mm cut depth. The surface quality were sacrificed for a faster toolpath, clocking in at 1.45 hours.




Wrenches

Tired of the cheap looking steel wrences that came with the shopbot?

Just download these awesome tools!

DXF, SVG, STEP and STL files for this project is downloadable for free through this thingiverse site.

You can download the Fusion files Including toolpaths through the 3D preview by clicing on the autodesk logo in the left lower corner. The toolpaths is currently not up to date, some of them is also missing.



















Aluminium milling on the shopbot

There is a lot of misunderstanding out there regarding milling aluminium on CNC routers. i am sharing todays work with some data on feedrates and cutters that you can use as a baseline for doing similar work in your labs. The parts shown is for a ongoing work, my hexapod robot.

The first cut! as you see, these are quite deep pockets. when roughing out areas like these, the key is to always have a good chipload. meaning, that instead of going to slow and just rubbing the metal, go deep and remove it!

Here i took a cut of 7mm, removing 4mm the first pass, then 3,5, before the finishing pass where the last 0,5mm millimeter was removed. all this using a feedrate of 8mm/sek, with a singleflute 6mm carbide bit.
I maxed out the spindle at 18K rpm.

when you buy your bit, buy a upcut! A compression bit will leave good finish on wood, giving a smooth finish with out fraying. on aluminium however, the key is to evacuate the chips as fast as possible. an ucput bit will do just that, dragging the chips out of the cut.

A downcut will do the opposite, it will compress it it down in the cut you are leaving. Wile this works for the first pass, the cutter will break in the next, when you mill over all that compressed swarf.

Do you think you need to buy those expensive german made tools? No. they will last longer, they will give a better finish, but you will do just fine with cheap ebay tools when practicing.

On the long run however, the german and american made carbide tools are the more economic choice, as they can be ran at much higher feedrates, doing the job quicker.

A good tool will also leave a better finish, so that less work is left to do manualy. all the feeds and speeds i post are done with carbide mills. if you buy HSS tooling, i advise you to slow down a little.


This is a huge area that needed to be faced. when doing facing, you should be a bit agressive, so the chips are thrown away, so you dont mill over the chips you just cut loose. in my case, the vacuum system on the CNC mill was wery helpfull.

Here the deapth of cut where kept low at 2mm/sek, but at a higer feedrate of 15, which is realy pushing it when milling hard alloys like this.

Also, see the tiny holes? when drillling deliate features like this, activate peck drilling in vcarve.

This commands the shopbot to only go engage a certain depth of cut at once, then retreat to safeZ.

the depth it will use is set usingPassdepth at the cutter settings. this will break the chips, and avoid clogging the drillbit at the bottom of deep holes.
peck driling also reduces the chance of breaking delicate bit. in my case, the bit measured 2.1mm.

when dealing with tougher materials as aluminium, it is important to secure parts that will fall off, be cut loose or otherwise risk to be dragged into the cutting bit. not only would such an incident break an expensive bit, but can also cause serious injury as the cutter will often exceed speeds of 10K RPM.
when adding such screws, it is advised to make these holes in the vcarve file itself, so that you have specific controll over their position relative to other ares that will be cut.
If you drill these holdown holes by hand, the CNC will not be aware of their position, and may very well crash into them.



can you notice the stepped edge on the part being cut out?

when making deep cuts, you may clog the cutting bit, or risk welding the chips back onto the part itself. to avoid this, make an offset Pocket when making the first pass.

On the next pass, the cutter will not rub the previous edge, reducing workload, chatter and leaving room for clearing the chips. then, in the finnishing pass, make the cut at zero offset, so that you get a nice, shiny edge.

i have found that using climb cutting on both roughing and finishing, leaving 0,5-0,15mm is enough to achive a good finish, as leaving to little will result in rubbing, and a bad finish

For the finishing cut, a feedrate from 4-10 has given me sucsess, depending on the diameter of the cutter. as i mainly make small precise parts, i usualy use a 3mm upcut with one flute for finishing.


The freshly cut upper plate, with circuitboard and other parts mounted. When fitment of other components are determined, the plate will be removed, and the backside machined in a jig cut for the purpose.
I did not bother to do anything about the surface of the aluminium, but if you want to remove the pattern from the machining, a sanding pad with 800+ grid will do it in a few seconds.


This is the underside. for the servos to fit, i had to take a finnishing cut with the 3mm bit. The reason was that the 6mm bit left an excess radius, not alowing the servo to fully slide in. for this operation, i used the following data:

18000 RPM

1,5mm passdepth

5mm/s for feedrate

with a

single flute upcut 3mm carbide bit.

in comparison to the 3mm depth @10mm/sek with the 6mm bit, this went quite slow.

for other tools, you could use as a rule of thumb with pass depth: that you have 50% of the cutter diameter as max, meaning a 5mm bit would yield good results with 2,5mm as pass deapth.


The chips sould be quite rough and sharp. if they are tiny and flaky, or just like powder, you are not cutting agressively enough. That will wear your cutting tool down faster than using the right settings.
remember that milling will always create heat. you don't want that heat to stay in neither the cuttingbit or the material, you want to throw it away With the chips.
To be able to crete such large chips, it is importatant that you use a single or doube flute tool. As having more flutes increase the amount of material removed, you must also increase the feedrate, or lower the RPM to keep the amount of removed material constant.


The aftermath. These will be used to cast the other components of the hexapod. 

animaliordinari Proudly Powered by Blogger